What is The Gospel of Peter?
The Gospel of Peter is a pseudepigraphal work that purports to be written by Peter but in fact relates a false view of Jesus Christ. The Gospel of Peter contains 60 verses and deals with events surrounding the end of Jesus’ life. The original is thought to have been written c. AD 150, although the earliest extant manuscript dates from the 8th or 9th century.
The first mention of the Gospel of Peter was made by Bishop Serapion of Antioch (c. AD 200) in a letter titled “Concerning what is known as the Gospel of Peter.” In this letter Serapion advised church leaders not to read the so-called Gospel to their congregations because of its Docetic content. He also condemned the Gospel of Peter as a forgery.
What is Docetism? One form of Docetism (Marcionism) maintained that Christ was so divine He could not have been human. He only appeared to be made of flesh and blood, His body being a phantasm. Other groups held that, while Jesus was a man in the flesh, Christ was a separate entity who entered Jesus’ body in the form of a dove at His baptism, empowering Him to perform miracles. The “Christ entity” then abandoned Jesus on the cross. Docetism was unequivocally rejected at the First Council of Nicaea in AD 325 and is regarded as heretical by Catholics and Protestants alike. Docetism largely died out during the first millennium.
The Gospel of Peter says that on the cross Jesus cried out, “My power, my power, thou hast forsaken me,” rather than “My God, my God, why has thou forsaken me?” (Mark 15:34). In the account of the crucifixion, the Gospel of Peter carefully avoids saying that Jesus died, asserting instead that He “was taken up.” This idea of escaping actual death is mirrored in the Qur’an, Sura 4:157–158: “But Allah took him up unto Himself.” The Gospel of Peter suggests that Christ was “taken up” to the Divine Presence at the moment His divine power left His bodily shell, which had only been a temporary residence. This teaching, together with the claim that Jesus “remained silent, as though he felt no pain” on the cross, highlights the error of Docetism.
Another way in which the Gospel of Peter differs from the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John is the description of events after Jesus’ body was laid in the tomb. The Gospel of Peter says that the guards “saw the heavens opened, and two men descend with a great light and approach the tomb. . . . Again they saw three men come forth from the tomb, and two of them supporting one, and a cross following them. And the heads of the two reached to heaven, but the head of him who was led by them overpassed the heavens. And they heard a voice from the heavens, saying, ‘You have preached to them that sleep.’ And a response was heard from the cross, ‘Yes.’” This passage has some Gnostic leanings.
Here are some of the main problems with the Gospel of Peter:
And if that is not enough to shed doubt on the veracity of the Gospel of Peter, we also have the testimony of Eusebius. The historian made reference to the Gospel of Peter in his writings, claiming that Apollo was the god originally mentioned in the Gospel of Peter, not Jesus Christ. Eusebius said the name of Jesus Christ was written over the name of Apollo.
The Gospel of Peter disagrees with the four canonical Gospels in vitally important areas, including the physical death and bodily resurrection of our Lord and Savior.
The first mention of the Gospel of Peter was made by Bishop Serapion of Antioch (c. AD 200) in a letter titled “Concerning what is known as the Gospel of Peter.” In this letter Serapion advised church leaders not to read the so-called Gospel to their congregations because of its Docetic content. He also condemned the Gospel of Peter as a forgery.
What is Docetism? One form of Docetism (Marcionism) maintained that Christ was so divine He could not have been human. He only appeared to be made of flesh and blood, His body being a phantasm. Other groups held that, while Jesus was a man in the flesh, Christ was a separate entity who entered Jesus’ body in the form of a dove at His baptism, empowering Him to perform miracles. The “Christ entity” then abandoned Jesus on the cross. Docetism was unequivocally rejected at the First Council of Nicaea in AD 325 and is regarded as heretical by Catholics and Protestants alike. Docetism largely died out during the first millennium.
The Gospel of Peter says that on the cross Jesus cried out, “My power, my power, thou hast forsaken me,” rather than “My God, my God, why has thou forsaken me?” (Mark 15:34). In the account of the crucifixion, the Gospel of Peter carefully avoids saying that Jesus died, asserting instead that He “was taken up.” This idea of escaping actual death is mirrored in the Qur’an, Sura 4:157–158: “But Allah took him up unto Himself.” The Gospel of Peter suggests that Christ was “taken up” to the Divine Presence at the moment His divine power left His bodily shell, which had only been a temporary residence. This teaching, together with the claim that Jesus “remained silent, as though he felt no pain” on the cross, highlights the error of Docetism.
Another way in which the Gospel of Peter differs from the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John is the description of events after Jesus’ body was laid in the tomb. The Gospel of Peter says that the guards “saw the heavens opened, and two men descend with a great light and approach the tomb. . . . Again they saw three men come forth from the tomb, and two of them supporting one, and a cross following them. And the heads of the two reached to heaven, but the head of him who was led by them overpassed the heavens. And they heard a voice from the heavens, saying, ‘You have preached to them that sleep.’ And a response was heard from the cross, ‘Yes.’” This passage has some Gnostic leanings.
Here are some of the main problems with the Gospel of Peter:
- Joseph of Arimathea is said to be a personal friend of Pontius Pilate.
- Pontius Pilate is exonerated from all responsibility. Herod Antipas takes over for him, assuming the responsibility which, in Luke’s Gospel, Herod declines to accept.
- Jesus is “taken up” from the cross, and His death is not mentioned.
- Two supernatural beings enter the tomb, and three emerge.
- The cross is described as floating out of the tomb and saying “Yes” to a voice from heaven.
- There is no mention of witnesses seeing Jesus alive after He was dragged out of the tomb.
And if that is not enough to shed doubt on the veracity of the Gospel of Peter, we also have the testimony of Eusebius. The historian made reference to the Gospel of Peter in his writings, claiming that Apollo was the god originally mentioned in the Gospel of Peter, not Jesus Christ. Eusebius said the name of Jesus Christ was written over the name of Apollo.
The Gospel of Peter disagrees with the four canonical Gospels in vitally important areas, including the physical death and bodily resurrection of our Lord and Savior.
Recent
Archive
2025
January
The Bible's Missing Books?Why I Choose to Believe the Bible.....Lost Books?What is The Gospel of Peter?How to Find Gold in God's Word: Reading the Bible with Supernatural HelpDO BELIEVERS IMMEDIATELY GO TO HEAVEN?WILL CHRISTIANS BE JUDGED BY GOD?THE COSMOS KEEPS PREACHINGHOW GENESIS 1 COMMUNICATES WHAT THE WHOLE BIBLE IS ABOUTWHEN DID GOD CREATE ANGELS?HOW GREAT IS OUR GODWHY DID THE FIRST HUMAN LIVE SO LONG?NEVER TRUST A SNAKEWHY DID GOD FORBID ONE TREE IN EDEN?LIFE ON OTHER PLANETSONE SENTENCE SUMMARIES: GENESIS 1-3MIDDAY PRAISE: HOW GREAT IS THE GREATNESS OF GODLEGGED, TALKING SNAKEHOW, WHY, AND WHEN DID SATAN FALL FROM HEAVEN?BIBLE KNOWLEDGE: DON'T FLAUNT ITWHY DID GOD ACCEPT ABEL'S OFFERING BUT REJECT CAIN'S OFFERING?WAS CAIN'S WIFE HIS SISTER?MIDDAY PRAISE: RUN AND RUN (CHRIST IS ALL MY RIGHTEOUSNESS)GENESIS 4:16-26: PROGRESS WITHOUT GODTWO SEEDSTHE PROBLEM WITH THE WORLDWHO/WHAT WERE THE NEPHILIM?WHAT DOES IT MEAN THAT THE LORD REGRETTED?IS GENESIS 1 A LITERAL 24 DAY?THE ARK: A BOAT FOR ALL ANIMALSWERE BUGS ON THE ARK?CARING FOR ANIMALS ON THE ARK?MIDDAY PRAISE: THE LORD ALMIGHTY REIGNSPLEASING AROMAMIDDAY PRAISE: COMPLETELY KNOWN, COMPLETELY LOVEDTHE FAITH OF NOAHWALKING WITH GODTHREE MINUTE THEOLOGY: GENESIS 6-7MIDDAY PRAISE: VICTORY IN JESUSTHREE MINUTE THEOLOGY: GENESIS 8-9INEBRIATED NOAHPELEG THE DIVIDER?SKIN COLOR?ONE BLOOD, ONE RACE, : THE ORIGIN OF RACESINTHREE MINUTE THEOLOGY: GENESIS 10-11RAW OR WELL DONE?HOW LONG DID IT TAKE TO BUILD THE ARK?YOU'RE NOT THE EXCEPTIONWHAT IS IMPORTANT ABOUT THE LAND OF UZ?I LOST MY CHILD. THEN THE BOOK OF JOB MADE SENSEWHO WROTE JOB?THE BIBLE EXPLAINED: JOBTHREE MINUTE THEOLOGY: JOB 1-2WHAT IS THEODICY?MIDDAY PRAISE: BLESSED BE YOUR NAMEWHAT DOES IT MEAN THAT JOB WAS UPRIGHT AND BLAMELESSWHY PRAY FOR PROTECTION WHEN SUFFERING KEEPS COMING?THE DARK SIDEDEPRESSIONCALLING A SPADE A SPADEELIPHAZTHE GOSPEL IN JOBRECKONING THE MESSAGE OF JOBTHREE MINUTE THEOLOGY: JOB 3-6MIDDAY PRAISE: CHRIST THE SURE AND STEAY ANCHORDEFIANT FAITH IN THE FACE OF SUFFERINGA PLAY FOR VOICESFAITH AND WORKSA LYING SPIRITINFERIORITY COMPLEXMIDDAY PRAISE: I ASKED THE LORD THAT I MIGHT GROW
February
THE WEIGHT OF SUFFERINGAN UNANSWERABLE QUESTIONGUILT TRIPSHONEST WORDSSUCCESSFUL LIVINGJACKIE GIBSON: SUFFERING LOSSHow the Message Translation Can Be Beneficial in Reading the Book of JobMERE HUMANITYSLEEPLESSNESSPOURING OUT THE HEARTJOB THE SINNERASSURANCEWHY, GOD? THE MYSTERY OF SUFFERINGSERMON VIDEO: BLESSED IS THE ONE WHOM GOD CORRECTSHOW TO HELP THE HURTINGTHE SINS OF THE CHILDRENTHE WAY OF THE CROSSBILDADTHE GREAT WORK OF RAINMIDDAY PRAISE: ALL MY WAYS ARE KNOWN TO YOUFOUR DARKNESSESDOUBTHESEDA LOOK OF AGONYLET GOD BE GODTHREE MINUTE THEOLOGY: JOB 10-14THE FIRST GOSPELYESTHE SQUEAKY WHEEL
No Comments